People are not good and sometimes make mistakes. We take shortcuts, forget learn how to do things, or develop into distracted at occasions once we shouldn’t. In most points of our lives, these should not things that have dire consequences. At work, nonetheless, surrounded by hazards, these types of errors can alter lives, even end them. So, although human beings will not be perfect, we need to make our safety programs as near excellent as we can.
PPE Focus: Face Shields
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a side of safety where individuals are likely to make many mistakes, and for a wide range of reasons. Often, we think that the mere wearing of PPE makes us proof against injury. With as a lot emphasis as we place on eye protection and head protection, can we lose sight (no pun meant) of protecting our faces? Definitely, eye protection is important, since eye accidents can lead to everlasting blindness. Equally vital is head protection, preventing fatal head injuries the very best that we can. Face accidents might not seem as significant a priority. They don’t have the fast, permanent, and potentially fatal consequences of the others. With that said, although, an employer’s duty is to protect all parts of their staff, including their faces.
That duty consists of identifying tasks the place face shields needs to be used, providing face shields for employees to make use of, training them to make use of face shields accurately, and to appropriate workers when face shields are used incorrectly or not used at all. The first components are easy. Our employees will make mistakes. Correcting these errors and enforcing your company’s face shield requirements is an essential part of an efficient PPE program. Unfortunately, too usually, this facet of the PPE program isn’t enforced until after an worker is injured.
Situations to Use Face Shields
Consider the next conditions where face shields should have been used, and the results for the injured workers and their employers.
An employee was filling ammonia nurse tanks from a bulk plant. The worker was distracted while closing the valves, and mistakenly turned the improper valve, causing a pressure release in the line. The release of anhydrous ammonia splashed on the worker’s face. The employee was hospitalized for chemical burns on and around the face.
An employee was putting in a water pipe at a multifamily residential development project. The employee initially was working an excavator, then climbed down from the excavator to cut a ten-inch water pipe with a cut-off saw. The noticed kicked back and struck the worker’s face. Co-workers called emergency services, who transported the employee to the hospital. The employee was admitted to the hospital and treated for facial lacerations that prolonged from underneath the left eye to underneath the jaw.
In the first state of affairs, the worker suffered critical chemical burns. A face shield would have significantly reduced the chemical publicity, the extent of the chemical burns, and possibly may have prevented any ammonia from splashing on the worker’s face. Yes, the employee turned the flawed valve, but does that imply that the employer is absolved of all accountability for this incident? In fact not. The fact stays that the employer ought to provide staff filling ammonia nurse tanks with face shields, train employees to make use of the face shields accurately, and require them to use them when performing this task. Then they have to continually and constantly implement the face shield requirements. Doing so would have provided additional protection to the employee, even from the effects of the employee’s own actions.